Wind AlliesTier 2

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

The 27 public Wind Allies decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

• Zeke 80 cards · placed #1
• Panrad 80 cards · placed #10
• Abbey 80 cards · placed #14
• Reanbell 80 cards · placed #18
• McTinBeb 81 cards · placed #23
• SaichiroFx 80 cards · placed #40
• Nael 78 cards · placed #41
• Alick 80 cards · placed #42
• Grimml 80 cards · placed #46
• Jez 80 cards · placed #47
• SerRamen 80 cards · placed #52
• Tsu 80 cards · placed #61
• Donglefutz 80 cards · placed #62
• Suru 80 cards · placed #64
• Elliz 72 cards · placed #65
• Hush 80 cards · placed #66
• alden 80 cards · placed #68
• Liel 80 cards · placed #72
• Skviz 80 cards · placed #73
• Nelle 80 cards · placed #74
• Kael 73 cards · placed #85
• Maics 80 cards · placed #89
• catwu 80 cards · placed #92
• Karding 80 cards · placed #102
• Penny 80 cards · placed #105
• Tawkiiiiii 72 cards · placed #107
• Gids 80 cards · placed #108

In 15 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down).

Winners more often ran: Quicksilver Grail, Inspiring Call, Winbless Gatekeeper. Losers more often ran: Trained Hawk, Smoke Bombs, Seeking Shot.

↑ Played more by winners

Quicksilver Grail

Winning decks ran 0.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.0.

Of 15 mirrors: the winner ran more in 7, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 8.

Inspiring Call

Winning decks ran 2.9 copies on average, losing decks 2.1.

Of 15 mirrors: the winner ran more in 9, the loser ran more in 3, both ran the same in 3.

Winbless Gatekeeper

Winning decks ran 1.1 copies on average, losing decks 0.0.

Of 15 mirrors: the winner ran more in 5, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 10.

Safeguard Amulet

Winning decks ran 0.7 copies on average, losing decks 0.4.

Of 15 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 11.

Aesan Protector

Winning decks ran 2.7 copies on average, losing decks 2.4.

Of 15 mirrors: the winner ran more in 5, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 8.

Rallied Advance

Winning decks ran 0.9 copies on average, losing decks 0.4.

Of 15 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 10.

↓ Played more by losers

Trained Hawk

Losing decks ran 2.6 copies on average, winning decks 1.9.

Of 15 mirrors: the loser ran more in 11, the winner ran more in 3, both ran the same in 1.

Smoke Bombs

Losing decks ran 0.5 copies on average, winning decks 0.3.

Of 15 mirrors: the loser ran more in 6, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 7.

Seeking Shot

Losing decks ran 1.1 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.

Of 15 mirrors: the loser ran more in 6, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 7.

Mark of Fervor

Losing decks ran 1.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.7.

Of 15 mirrors: the loser ran more in 6, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 7.

Trained Sharpshooter

Losing decks ran 1.5 copies on average, winning decks 1.0.

Of 15 mirrors: the loser ran more in 6, the winner ran more in 3, both ran the same in 6.

Song of Nurturing

Losing decks ran 0.8 copies on average, winning decks 0.2.

Of 15 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 10.